Title: Things I Should Have Known
Author: Claire LaZebnik
Publisher: Houghton Mifflin Harcout
Paperback: 320 pages
Summary: (taken from Goodreads)
From the author of Epic Fail comes the story of Chloe Mitchell, a Los Angeles girl on a quest to find love for her autistic sister, Ivy. Ethan, from Ivy’s class, seems like the perfect match. It’s unfortunate that his older brother, David, is one of Chloe’s least favorite people, but Chloe can deal, especially when she realizes that David is just as devoted to Ethan as she is to Ivy.
Uncommonly honest and refreshingly funny, this is a story about sisterhood, autism, and first love. Chloe, Ivy, David, and Ethan, who form a quirky and lovable circle, will steal readers’ hearts and remind us all that it’s okay to be a different kind of normal.
*I received a free copy of this book from the publisher in exchange for an honest review through NetGalley.*
Overall Rating: 3 out of 5
We are not supposed to judge books by covers or at least that is how that platitude goes, however, the cover for this book was a large factor as to why I picked it up. I found the description of the book to be an interesting one, and adding in another element to a typical YA book of having an autistic sibling related to the main character drew me in. I thought it was clever playing with the title on the cover to change the tense of when the character should have have/did “know” these important things. I was a little let down by this idea not coming up more in the book itself.
Let me start with what I think is my really positive takeaway from the book. I think that the autistic characters in the book were written very well and respectfully. There is some interesting nuance used both in developing those characters themselves and, maybe more strikingly in the book, the way that family members interact with these characters. Any time the book was focused on these relationships I was really interested, and I think that it did a wonderful job portraying these things.
Unfortunately, I found the rest of the novel to be a bit boring and predictable. I did not particularly like the main character Chloe and think that although there is some growth throughout the book she starts off in such a ludicrously stereotypical place that this character growth doesn’t feel satisfactory. The same can be said about her dating life in the book. Things are not just telegraphed but explicitly stated at times in the book in a way that makes them feel a bit inevitable and like a slog to get through. I kept hoping that something would happen to subvert this or at least be propelled forward in an interesting way, but at least in my opinion it did not.
That is not to say the book was entirely predictable. There were a few moments that genuinely seemed to work against the overly simplistic and predictable nature of the majority of the book which were greatly appreciated. For that reason, I think the book may be one that high school students would enjoy reading. The more I think about it, the more I feel my criticisms may come from a place of not being the target audience. Overall I would say it is decent but definitely not something I would go out of my way to read.